AI-enhanced Comparative Judgement
CJ History
Our newest project for Secondary schools
CJ History is our newest AI assessment project. It will assess written responses by Year 7 pupils to the following essay question.
Human in the loop
With our flexible approach, you can choose your preferred blend of human and AI judging. We recommend 10% human judgements and 90% AI. If you follow this approach, each piece of pupil writing is seen twice by a human and 18 times by AI, typically requiring just 10-15 minutes of teacher time. Teachers can also choose to leave audio comments on each piece of writing, which will be transcribed by AI and turned into a polished paragraph of written feedback.
Comparative Judgement in 4 steps
1.We set the task, so everyone is responding to the same question.
2.Upload your pupils’ scripts on our specially coded paper.
3.Judge writing, comparing two pieces of writing on screen, side-by-side to determine which is best.
4.Benchmark attainment and progress across your school, and nationally, with the information and statistics in your school's individual report.
Why are schools using us?
Speed
With the workload shared among staff, the process is very quick, as teachers need to make only two comparative decisions per script.
Accuracy
Our AI provides transparent and verifiable accuracy. Unlike 'black box' systems that require manual re-marking, you can see our AI's agreement rate with your teachers. This saves time and increases your confidence in the results.
Validity
Teachers make holistic judgements based on the overall quality of the writing. We combine together thousands of teacher judgements with AI judgements to create a highly reliable scale of writing.
Extensive and in-depth reporting
Product Feature
Detailed Reporting
With our national projects you can track every pupils' progress over time and see how their performance compares to the cohort.
